<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Regional architecture and the reality of power politics</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/06/19/regional-architecture-and-the-reality-of-power-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/06/19/regional-architecture-and-the-reality-of-power-politics/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: One More Word on Regional Architecture &#171; East Asia Forum</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/06/19/regional-architecture-and-the-reality-of-power-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link> <dc:creator>One More Word on Regional Architecture &#171; East Asia Forum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:55:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://eastasiaforum.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-316</guid> <description>[...] One More Word on Regional&#160;Architecture  Hugh White is right that ‘what we need to do is to agree that we can build a dialogue of equals on strategic questions despite differences in values’.  That is precisely what ‘’the simplest rules of engagement’’ for discussion need to cover.  This is something very basic indeed – all of the major powers need to agree to treat each other as equals, with equally legitimate political systems and international interests.  Without that, the basic conditions for a cooperative dialogue about Asia’s strategic future cannot be met.’ (link). [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One More Word on Regional&nbsp;Architecture  Hugh White is right that ‘what we need to do is to agree that we can build a dialogue of equals on strategic questions despite differences in values’.  That is precisely what ‘’the simplest rules of engagement’’ for discussion need to cover.  This is something very basic indeed – all of the major powers need to agree to treat each other as equals, with equally legitimate political systems and international interests.  Without that, the basic conditions for a cooperative dialogue about Asia’s strategic future cannot be met.’ (link). [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
