<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Getting foreign investment policy and China right</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/03/getting-foreign-investment-policy-and-china-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/03/getting-foreign-investment-policy-and-china-right/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Greg Lopez</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/03/getting-foreign-investment-policy-and-china-right/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link> <dc:creator>Greg Lopez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:58:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://eastasiaforum.wordpress.com/?p=145#comment-121</guid> <description>Peter Drysdale is correct in pointing out the strategic importance for a &#039;middle power&#039; like Australia &quot;...in reinforcing the Chinese drive towards the disciplines of the market, including through contestable ownership.&quot;
Coming from a country in ASEAN which is vary of Australia&#039;s attempts to integrate into East Asia, it would be good for Australia to address these issues pragmatically and realise that it is a &#039;middle power&#039;, nothing more.  Any wrong move would send the wrong signals to other developing countries in the East Asian region and confirm existing views of Australia.
Peter notes:
&quot;...But they do affect the strategic importance of the Australia government’s not boxing us into a choice based on an increasingly false dilemma, repeating some of the mistakes we made on Japan a few decades ago.&quot;
It would be good for all to understand these &#039;false dilemmas&#039; and disprove them. Clearly, these false dilemmas have some currency in Australian policymaking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Drysdale is correct in pointing out the strategic importance for a &#8216;middle power&#8217; like Australia &#8220;&#8230;in reinforcing the Chinese drive towards the disciplines of the market, including through contestable ownership.&#8221;</p><p>Coming from a country in ASEAN which is vary of Australia&#8217;s attempts to integrate into East Asia, it would be good for Australia to address these issues pragmatically and realise that it is a &#8216;middle power&#8217;, nothing more.  Any wrong move would send the wrong signals to other developing countries in the East Asian region and confirm existing views of Australia.</p><p>Peter notes:<br
/> &#8220;&#8230;But they do affect the strategic importance of the Australia government’s not boxing us into a choice based on an increasingly false dilemma, repeating some of the mistakes we made on Japan a few decades ago.&#8221;</p><p>It would be good for all to understand these &#8216;false dilemmas&#8217; and disprove them. Clearly, these false dilemmas have some currency in Australian policymaking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
