Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

The problems of success in Vietnam

Reading Time: 2 mins

In Brief

With an inflation rate running at 27% pa, current account deficit forecast at 9.2% of GDP, and a widening of the dong/dollar exchange rate between the official and informal markets (at times in excess of 7-8 percent), the Vietnamese government, whose emphasis had traditionally been on stability, is facing its first significant macroeconomic turbulence since opening the economy to international trade and investment almost 20 years ago.

Paradoxically, Vietnam’s success in attracting capital inflows over the last couple of years is behind the current problems. This has revealed some of the limitations of its reform process over the past five years.

The origins of the current macroeconomic problems stem principally from the failure of the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) to sterilize the surge of capital inflows (which took the form mainly of foreign direct investment and remittances from Vietnamese living abroad) whilst keeping a rigid exchange rate peg in 2007. This left the banking system awash with liquidity, fuelling credit growth of over 50% by the end of last year. Macroeconomic management has been complicated on the one hand, by a ‘young’ banking system inexperienced in pricing risks and, on the other hand, easy access to bank credit on the part of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) eager to expand investments into real estate, financial services, and other non-core activities. Easy credit, coupled with a nascent and poorly regulated stock market, also fuelled a spectacular boom and then bust which is currently dampening investor sentiments.

To make matters worse, 10 days ago, the SBV banned third currency trading by banks (the so-called ‘grey market’) in an effort to curb arbitrage and enforce the official exchange rate.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

This has incited fears that, unless exporters and others could be persuaded to sell dollars at the official exchange rate, the SBV could be left as the only legal supplier of foreign exchange, and would have to be prepared to use the country’s international reserves to back what is perceived to be an over-valued official exchange rate.

This is unfortunate as moves in the past month to broaden the exchange rate band and allow for some official depreciation of the dong were welcome, and still greater flexibility is needed in the management of the exchange rate in order to give greater effectiveness to monetary policy, without excessive reliance on capital controls which, over time, can become porous. At the same time, a much-needed reining in of the SOEs seems to be occurring and must be continued. As much of the capital inflow is underpinned by foreign direct investments into the industrial and tourism sectors, a sudden reversal of inflows (a la Thai style) is unlikely in spite of the downturn in the world economy. However, the seeming inability of the authorities to put together a coherent package of monetary and exchange rate policy at present undermines investor confidence, and could impact negatively on Vietnam’s growth prospects. Furthermore, Vietnam’s future in expanding its industrial base and participating successfully in the production networks of East Asia depends crucially on its government’s ability to restore macroeconomic stability, and to convince domestic and foreign investors that it has the institutions capable of managing future financial turbulence.

In the medium term, a positive outcome of the present period of instability could be a significant deepening of reforms in key macroeconomic institutions such as the State Bank of Vietnam, in terms of increased independence and capability in managing monetary policy and in the regulatory oversight of the financial system. The ultimate aim should be to develop a public perception that these key government policy and regulatory institutions are run by people with professional integrity. Legislative independence of the central bank and significant increase in its professional capability would be a good start.

2 responses to “The problems of success in Vietnam”

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.