<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: United States still the power to reckon with in Asia</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/28/united-states-still-the-power-to-reckon-with-in-asia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/28/united-states-still-the-power-to-reckon-with-in-asia/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Peter Drysdale</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/28/united-states-still-the-power-to-reckon-with-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link> <dc:creator>Peter Drysdale</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://eastasiaforum.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-132</guid> <description>Which way, up or down? The argument is that America&#039;s Middle Eastern adventures -- successful through the application of pre-eminent, if overstretched, hard power -- have seen the corrosion of America&#039;s soft power.
The evidence is not there yet. And the question is whether this is just a lag on the way down or a structural phenomenon.
In an era of ultimate hard power it is not so clear a priori what the relationship between soft and hard power is (witness Japan).
Yes, you could argue that hard power conquers all, as did the Soviet leadership in persuading itself that there were no internal contradictions in that strategy not so  long ago!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which way, up or down? The argument is that America&#8217;s Middle Eastern adventures &#8212; successful through the application of pre-eminent, if overstretched, hard power &#8212; have seen the corrosion of America&#8217;s soft power.</p><p>The evidence is not there yet. And the question is whether this is just a lag on the way down or a structural phenomenon.</p><p>In an era of ultimate hard power it is not so clear a priori what the relationship between soft and hard power is (witness Japan).</p><p>Yes, you could argue that hard power conquers all, as did the Soviet leadership in persuading itself that there were no internal contradictions in that strategy not so  long ago!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Manuel</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2008/07/28/united-states-still-the-power-to-reckon-with-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Manuel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:34:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://eastasiaforum.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-133</guid> <description>Soft power surely lags hard power though. It is rare that you have a country which has soft power before it has considerable economic and military power (France?).
One could argue that if China is to knock the US off the top slot for soft power, they should just concentrate on knocking them off the top spot in economic and military power and then the rest will come naturally.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soft power surely lags hard power though. It is rare that you have a country which has soft power before it has considerable economic and military power (France?).</p><p>One could argue that if China is to knock the US off the top slot for soft power, they should just concentrate on knocking them off the top spot in economic and military power and then the rest will come naturally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
