<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Japan: Party A vs. Party B</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/31/japan-party-a-vs-party-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/31/japan-party-a-vs-party-b/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Aurelia George Mulgan</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/31/japan-party-a-vs-party-b/comment-page-1/#comment-32504</link> <dc:creator>Aurelia George Mulgan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=4632#comment-32504</guid> <description>The $64,000 question for Japanese politics is whether the DPJ is the vehicle to bring about real regime change (which I think the Japanese people are really ready for and which so many commentators seem to think is in the offing). When I look at the DPJ crew and its leader, however, I have my doubts. If I were a Japanese, I&#039;d also have my doubts. Hatoyama is no Koizumi in terms of his pulling power. In fact, the DPJ is led by a team, which is pulling in a number of different directions, and which, as a collective, is endeavouring to make up for Hatoyama&#039;s deficiencies.
Party A and Party B (a novel concept that Tobias injects into this discourse) is another way of saying: &#039;what&#039;s the difference between the two parties&#039;? Good Question!! They&#039;re covering each other&#039;s policies in key areas, but Tobias is also right in pointing to the way in which the LDP has gone into overdrive with its scare-mongering campaign against the DPJ. I think they&#039;ve got a hot line to Pyongyang, the last request being: &#039;how about a few nuclear/ballistic missile tests to do us a big favour over here&#039;. And of course, with exquisite timing, Kim Jong Il obliged.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $64,000 question for Japanese politics is whether the DPJ is the vehicle to bring about real regime change (which I think the Japanese people are really ready for and which so many commentators seem to think is in the offing). When I look at the DPJ crew and its leader, however, I have my doubts. If I were a Japanese, I&#8217;d also have my doubts. Hatoyama is no Koizumi in terms of his pulling power. In fact, the DPJ is led by a team, which is pulling in a number of different directions, and which, as a collective, is endeavouring to make up for Hatoyama&#8217;s deficiencies.</p><p>Party A and Party B (a novel concept that Tobias injects into this discourse) is another way of saying: &#8216;what&#8217;s the difference between the two parties&#8217;? Good Question!! They&#8217;re covering each other&#8217;s policies in key areas, but Tobias is also right in pointing to the way in which the LDP has gone into overdrive with its scare-mongering campaign against the DPJ. I think they&#8217;ve got a hot line to Pyongyang, the last request being: &#8216;how about a few nuclear/ballistic missile tests to do us a big favour over here&#8217;. And of course, with exquisite timing, Kim Jong Il obliged.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
