<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The DPJ will bring the ships home — and open Japan&#8217;s economy to the US?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/08/03/the-dpj-will-bring-the-ships-home-and-open-japans-economy-to-the-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/08/03/the-dpj-will-bring-the-ships-home-and-open-japans-economy-to-the-us/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Aurelia George Mulgan</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/08/03/the-dpj-will-bring-the-ships-home-and-open-japans-economy-to-the-us/comment-page-1/#comment-47957</link> <dc:creator>Aurelia George Mulgan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=6150#comment-47957</guid> <description>What we&#039;re witnessing at the current moment in Japan is a pretty unprecedented phenomenon: real party competition on policy issues - with the sharpest distinctions evident in areas such as agricultural/agricultural trade policy and security/alliance policy. In other areas such as hand-outs, it&#039;s hard to distinguish between the two. Even if Japan doesn&#039;t make it to a fully fledged two-party system this time round with &#039;regime change&#039;, some aspects of that system are certainly in evidence. It makes a real change from the pivot of policy debate being &#039;the party versus government&#039;. And it presents a real challenge for groups just as Keidanren and JA (Japan Agriculture) even more so - which are joined at the hip with the LDP. Are they going to learn how to operate in a real two-party system of alternating governments, or are they going to continue with their strong partisan alignment? The latter may leave them out in the cold - a totally new experience for JA, for example. I expect Keidanren will soon establish a productive modus vivendi with a DPJ government, particularly in view of the latter&#039;s support for a Japan-US FTA.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we&#8217;re witnessing at the current moment in Japan is a pretty unprecedented phenomenon: real party competition on policy issues &#8211; with the sharpest distinctions evident in areas such as agricultural/agricultural trade policy and security/alliance policy. In other areas such as hand-outs, it&#8217;s hard to distinguish between the two. Even if Japan doesn&#8217;t make it to a fully fledged two-party system this time round with &#8216;regime change&#8217;, some aspects of that system are certainly in evidence. It makes a real change from the pivot of policy debate being &#8216;the party versus government&#8217;. And it presents a real challenge for groups just as Keidanren and JA (Japan Agriculture) even more so &#8211; which are joined at the hip with the LDP. Are they going to learn how to operate in a real two-party system of alternating governments, or are they going to continue with their strong partisan alignment? The latter may leave them out in the cold &#8211; a totally new experience for JA, for example. I expect Keidanren will soon establish a productive modus vivendi with a DPJ government, particularly in view of the latter&#8217;s support for a Japan-US FTA.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
