<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Obama goes to China</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/15/obama-goes-to-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/15/obama-goes-to-china/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ken Ward</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/15/obama-goes-to-china/comment-page-1/#comment-76627</link> <dc:creator>Ken Ward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=7866#comment-76627</guid> <description>Given that Obama has said a great deal about the Israeli-Palestine conflict, both as candidate and as President,  and yet has achieved practically nothing, it may have been to his advantage that he said little about China before his visit.  The Zoellick and Steinberg phrases do seem grossly inadequate and anachronistic, however, as Hugh White says, in capturing the likely future evolution of the Sino-American relationship.  How does one offer, or deny, legitimacy and acceptance to a country that is already one&#039;s principal foreign creditor? It is this aspect of the relationship that may be unprecedented.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that Obama has said a great deal about the Israeli-Palestine conflict, both as candidate and as President,  and yet has achieved practically nothing, it may have been to his advantage that he said little about China before his visit.  The Zoellick and Steinberg phrases do seem grossly inadequate and anachronistic, however, as Hugh White says, in capturing the likely future evolution of the Sino-American relationship.  How does one offer, or deny, legitimacy and acceptance to a country that is already one&#8217;s principal foreign creditor? It is this aspect of the relationship that may be unprecedented.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew Elek</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/15/obama-goes-to-china/comment-page-1/#comment-76625</link> <dc:creator>Andrew Elek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=7866#comment-76625</guid> <description>China may become the world&#039;s largest economy soon, but it will not be a rich economy for a long time.
The challenge of adjusting to China&#039;s growing influence will last much longer - it has just begun.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China may become the world&#8217;s largest economy soon, but it will not be a rich economy for a long time.<br
/> The challenge of adjusting to China&#8217;s growing influence will last much longer &#8211; it has just begun.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tesserian</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/15/obama-goes-to-china/comment-page-1/#comment-76531</link> <dc:creator>Tesserian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:51:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=7866#comment-76531</guid> <description>End &quot;Imperial Republic&quot; strategy.
Begin &quot;Great Nation State&quot; strategy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>End &#8220;Imperial Republic&#8221; strategy.</p><p>Begin &#8220;Great Nation State&#8221; strategy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
