<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The China syndrome on exchange rates</title> <atom:link href="http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/02/09/the-china-syndrome-on-exchange-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/02/09/the-china-syndrome-on-exchange-rates/</link> <description>Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Lincoln Fung</title><link>http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/02/09/the-china-syndrome-on-exchange-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-96800</link> <dc:creator>Lincoln Fung</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eastasiaforum.org/?p=9821#comment-96800</guid> <description>Mohamed Ariff claims that “There is near-consensus that the current global economic illness is primarily due to deep-seated global imbalances between production and consumption, savings and investment, and imports and exports of goods and services.”
One has to ask some questions, like: how was such a “near-consensus”, if there was any, reached?
I am afraid to say that I really do not understand the &quot;near consensus&quot;, causation relationship between them. Would the author be kind enough to elaborate on that please?
I have thought imbalances are a normal part of life, just as savings and borrowings. I think that is how people have developed economic theories of inter-temporal choices based on the life-cycle income hypothesis. For example, developed by Modidliani, a winner of Nobel Prize in economics in 1985. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mohamed Ariff claims that “There is near-consensus that the current global economic illness is primarily due to deep-seated global imbalances between production and consumption, savings and investment, and imports and exports of goods and services.”</p><p>One has to ask some questions, like: how was such a “near-consensus”, if there was any, reached?</p><p>I am afraid to say that I really do not understand the &#8220;near consensus&#8221;, causation relationship between them. Would the author be kind enough to elaborate on that please?</p><p>I have thought imbalances are a normal part of life, just as savings and borrowings. I think that is how people have developed economic theories of inter-temporal choices based on the life-cycle income hypothesis. For example, developed by Modidliani, a winner of Nobel Prize in economics in 1985.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
