Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

How November defines US engagement in Southeast Asia

Reading Time: 4 mins

In Brief

Put yourself in US assistant secretary of state for East Asian affairs, Kurt Campbell’s shoes – National Security Council Senior Director for Asia, Jeff Bader’s moccasins would work too – and think about this November. It’s not quite a horror movie – more like ‘Gallipoli’.

The scene is Bader’s office in the Old Executive Office Building, the camera slowly pans 360 – security safe a crack open with papers hanging out, cabinet spilling over with books on various moments in Asian history, half empty take-out container with braised tofu teasing mold, couch rumpled – looking slept on, 14 foot ceilings feeling unappreciated.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Campbell, standing next to Bader seated, both grimacing, brows knit in unison, the camera pans down Kurt’s arm past the signature orange watch wristband to his hand growing roots into Jeff’s desk, next to it is a calendar – the POTUS’s calendar for November 2010. A pink post-it with Rahm Emanuel’s extension stuck to the upper left corner… key Tubular Bells music.

November is ugly. It defines the challenge for US policy in Asia. The President, one of the most capable, articulate, and marketable leaders in recent history – a guy who actually grew up in Indonesia for several years – has defined himself as the ‘Pacific President’. Commitments have been made – ‘we get it’, ‘being there is 90 per cent of the game in Asia,’ and so we look forward to the 2nd ASEAN-US Summit.

The low hanging fruit left by the Bush Administration has been plucked. Officials at the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs rock back on their davenport smiling as they see the potential for the earlier than expected fruition of their prophecies that the US can say it is committed to Asia, but it can’t sustain that commitment. Are they right?

Now it’s time to deliver, to show up – or to be marvellously innovative.

A drop of sweat pops onto the calendar below with a pop! that shakes both men.  They stare:

  • – Nov 2 – US mid-term elections;
  • – Nov 11-12, G20 Summit in Seoul;
  • – Nov 13-14, APEC Leaders meeting in Yokohama …

The heat is on the Democrats in the House and Senate, the Republicans have decided to go completely ‘no’ and rely on historical patterns of anti-incumbency in mid-term elections, particularly acute when your party holds the White House and both chambers on the Hill. That makes a trade agenda, the fundamental platform of credible and sustainable Asia policy, untouchable.

The G20 is the new global architecture and hosted by the President’s good friend, Korean President Lee Myung-bak – he’ll be there; the APEC Leaders meeting is a must because you can’t no-show, no matter how badly Hatoyama is jangling the Alliance, when you are hosting the party in Hawaii next year.

What about the US-ASEAN Summit?  It is core to US engagement in regional trade and security architecture. Secretary Clinton said the centrality of ASEAN was a core principle for Asian regionalism in her Honolulu speech just 3 months ago. The President has committed to attend after verily initiating the forum in Singapore last November. ASEAN has invited the President to Hanoi – but in October, which is the date for the ASEAN Summit, ASEAN + 3 and the East Asia Summit (EAS).

Truth be told, Hanoi would make so much sense – a diplomatic hat trick in the waiting. It is the 15th anniversary of US-Vietnam relations, Hanoi’s 1000th birthday and a chance to promote, without even saying a word, just by being there, economic reformers and pro-engagement Vietnamese leaders who are being challenged by the withered but powerful septa- and octogenarians in the Communist Party of Vietnam in the run up to the 11th National Party Congress in early 2011.

But October is a non-starter.  The Chicago Mafia, the President’s political cerebral cortex in the White House, won’t let him out in the world weeks ahead of mid-terms.  They’ve demonstrated their muscle twice before smothering planned Indonesia visits in favour of trips to Ohio to stump for health care reform – and not without results.  Yet, ASEAN has clearly indicated it is not possible to hold a US-ASEAN Summit on Japanese (or another other non-ASEAN-American) soil.

Campbell and Bader are experienced, capable officials. But their options are limited. The domestic political forces in the White House are empowered and don’t even consider such conflicts to be a competition. The President will need to step in and make his views known. If he does so, there is a way to lead in Asia. Make no mistake; getting ASEAN right is fundamental to American strength in dealing with China, Japan, India and the rest of Asia.

The options are:

  • – Add two days in Hanoi after APEC and convince the ASEAN leaders to fly from Japan to Hanoi to hold the 2nd Annual US ASEAN Summit;
  • – Add Hanoi to the planned June trip to Indonesia and Australia;
  • – Invite the ASEAN leaders to Hawaii or Washington on their way to or from the UN General Assembly meeting in September

The pressure is on.  The stakes are high, but this movie could and should end with a happy ending.

Ernest Z Bower is a senior adviser and director of the South East Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C.

This article was first published here by CSIS.

Comments are closed.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.