Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

China needs to raise interest rates

Reading Time: 4 mins

In Brief

Latest data released by the Chinese State Statistical Bureau in 2010 indicates the consumer price index in China increased by 2.8 per cent and the producer price index by 6.8 per cent year-on-year to April this year. The growing inflationary pressure again highlights the need for China to raise interest rates.

In the wake of the global financial crisis countries including Australia and India, raised interest rates in order to control potential inflationary problems. On 28 April Brazil also raised interest rates by 75 base points to 9.5 per cent. In light of China’s economic fundamentals, China should follow suit rapidly.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

The Chinese central bank, the People’s Bank of China, responded to the rapid slow-down of economic growth in the second half of 2008, by reducing the loan rate from 7.41 per cent in August to 5.29 per cent in January 2009 and the deposit rate from 4.41 per cent in September 2008 to 2.25 per cent in February 2009. Thanks to strong economic fundamentals and a decisive stimulus policy package implemented by the Chinese government, China’s economy experienced a V-shaped recovery from 2009 to the present.

Crucial economic indicators, including steel output, electricity generation, industrial output, car sales and housing, began to recover from the end of 2008 to 2009. GDP growth touched bottom at 6.1 per cent in the first quarter of 2009, recovering to reach increases of 11.9 per cent in the first quarter of this year. This rate of growth is widely recognised as being the potential growth rate of supply capacity in China.

The strong recovery has, in part, been facilitated by excessive expansion of both credit and money supply which both grew at 30 per cent in 2009. That was the second highest growth rate for bank loans, and the third highest growth rate of money supply, in the post reform period (since the late 1970’s). It is not surprising that the abnormal surge credit and money supply eventually introduced inflationary pressures into the Chinese economy.

The Chinese stock market was the first affected by this expansion. The A-share price index on the Shanghai stock exchange increased from the region of 1800 in late 2008 to reach 3123 in June, 2009. This surge in stock market prices was brought under control when the government securities regulatory body (China Securities Regulation Commission) resumed approval of IPOs on the stock market. This speeded up the application and approval process for major corporate IPO’s.

The inflationary pressure then revealed itself in the more troublesome housing market. Albeit with housing price data, it is generally believed Chinese average house prices increased between 10 and 20 per cent in the second half of 2009, and in the big cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen this rate was even higher. Furthermore, housing prices grew even more strongly in the first four months of this year at an annualized rate of 12.8 per cent.

Over the last six months the Chinese government has implemented a variety of measures with the aim of ‘managing the inflation expectations’. A range of methods have been used to combat surging housing market prices. Over the four months from mid-December 2009 to mid-April 2010, the state council of the Chinese government issued three official documents pertaining to housing price problems. In line with the spirit of these recent State Council documents, Beijing introduced a regulation temporarily prohibiting the purchase and/or the provision of housing mortgage loans to non-residents of the city. All these policy movements are without precedent.

The crucial driving force behind the high growth in the housing market is the rapid monetary expansion that occurred in 2009 and continues today. On top of the unusually high growth of 30 per cent, both bank credit and broad money supply again increased more than 20 per cent during the first four months of this year. Although the Chinese government’s efforts to control inflation are impressive, the prospects for fighting this inflation without effectively addressing the problems of loose money are not very encouraging.

Inflation is in essence a monetary phenomenon: this latest episode in Chinese macro-economic policy reminds us of the wisdom of this famous saying. In order to effectively control inflationary pressures, China needs to use the policy instrument of interest rates as a matter of urgency. That the People’s Bank of China may not be yet ready to raise interest rates quickly, is a topic requiring further, detailed examination. Stay tuned for more analysis of that!

Feng Lu is a professor of economics at Peking University.

3 responses to “China needs to raise interest rates”

  1. Clearly the monetary authority in China should use both interest rates and other quantitative measures to have the most effective and optimal monetary policy effects.

    One of the problems with not using interest rates is that it undervalues the costs of finance and the value of savings in the most direct way.

    The benefits of savings are not accruing to savers, but are realised by the banks or wasted in the inefficiency in finance due to quantitative measures.

    If it is not in a liquidity situation, monetary authorities should use price signals as much as possible, that is, interest rates, as their policy instruments.

  2. In my last comment, I said the importance and benefits of using price signal as a monetary policy instrument. In addition to what’s been said there, the allocative efficiency should not be overlooked and underestimated.

    Having said that, I was wondering how the Chinese monetary authority is going to use other measures to rein in excessive money already supplied and in circulation.

    I am not sure the normal monetary policy of open market operation in west countries, especially in the US, may necessarily apply with the same effects in China.

    If money in circulation is excessive and banking intermediaries are restoring their lending to the normal levels prior to the GFC onslaught, then it is imperative to use measures to reduce the amount of money in circulation.

    It remains to be seen how the Chinese monetary authority will do that in the most effective and efficient way in the sense that it has the minimum effects on allocative efficiency in the economy.

  3. How much of a problem is it to hike interest rates without yuan appreciation? Already capital is surging into China, and this process would only be encouraged further by higher interest rates in the absence of currency appreciation.

    Lincoln makes excellent points regarding the low price of credit sending the wrong signals. An interrelated problem is with credit standards and the system of credit expansion in China (my impression is the government effectively tells banks this is our national loan target, make sure we meet it)
    Foreign correspondents had a piece on this, see the ghost town in this story http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/content/2010/s2903061.htm

    As regards removing currency in circulation, this piece was insightful i thought. http://noelmaurer.typepad.com/aab/2010/01/i-have-your-chinese-consumer-price-inflation-right-here.html

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.