Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

How Cambodian nationalism is driving border disputes with Vietnam

Reading Time: 4 mins
Cambodian senator Hong Sok Hour (C), who belongs to a CNRP-affliated party, is escorted by police at Phnom Penh municipal court on October 7, 2015, in a case in which he could be jailed for 17 years after a court charged him on August 16 over the posting of a disputed document on social media about the border with Vietnam. (Photo: AAP)

In Brief

To strengthen national unity and identity, Cambodian leaders have for generations tried to construct, or reconstruct, nationalist ideology around Cambodia’s enduring border disputes. The border disputes have become the main topic in Cambodian domestic politics and foreign policy since Cambodia gained independence from France in 1953. The disputes are the result of the unclear frontier demarcation by the colonial administration, and have led to armed conflicts between Cambodia and its neighbours.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

But some political leaders have gone too far and become ultra-nationalist. In Cambodia’s electoral democracy, some political parties have promoted a type of nationalism that positions itself explicitly against the country’s bigger neighbours to gain popular political support. A lack of political transparency, understanding and participation has made the general public more vulnerable to populist and nationalist policy agendas.

Anti-Vietnam nationalism and a perceived Vietnamese threat gained momentum since 2009, when the current opposition leader Sam Rainsy allegedly encouraged villagers to uproot border markers on the Cambodia–Vietnam border in Svay Rieng province. The border disputes intensified after lawmakers from the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) led a few hundred activists to the to-be-demarcated border region in north eastern provinces, leading to clashes and violence in June.

The border tension is compounded by an anti-Vietnamese political rhetoric that has gained steam since the general election in July 2013. The opposition parties have accused the government under the leadership of the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) of being under strong influence from Hanoi, of ceding territory to Vietnam and of allowing Vietnamese immigrants to illegally enter and work in Cambodia. Since April 2014 more than 2000 illegal Vietnamese immigrants have been deported. The opposition parties will continue to use the ‘Vietnam threat’ factor as a key part of its strategy to gain popular votes in the upcoming commune election in 2017 and the national election in 2018.

The stance of Cambodian opposition parties, including the CNRP, further complicates border negotiations with Vietnam. In 1985, Cambodia and Vietnam signed a treaty on border delimitation. And in 2005, both sides reached another complementary treaty on border issues. But these agreements were deemed illegitimate and rejected by Cambodia’s opposition parties.

On 9 June 2015, amid the renewed border tension between two countries, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen asked Vietnam to maintain peace and stability along the border during his meeting with Le Hong Anh, a member of the politburo of the Vietnamese Communist Party, in Phnom Penh. A few days later, Cambodia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation sent two diplomatic notes, dated 12 June and 14 June, to protest Vietnam’s violation of Cambodian territory. But Vietnam did not respond and accused ‘extremist groups’ in Cambodia of provoking the border tensions and clashes.

A key issue fuelling domestic opposition in Cambodia is allegations that the maps being used by the Cambodian government in its border negotiations with Vietnam are fake or inaccurate. In July 2015, to ‘verify the authenticity of maps’ being used by the Cambodian government, Hun Sen requested that the United Nations, France, the United Kingdom and the United States loan Cambodia the original maps that were prepared by France during the colonial period. After verifying the maps received from the UN and France, the Cambodian government confirmed the authenticity of the maps that were used to conduct border negotiations with Vietnam.

The Cambodian government has now called for an end to the politicisation of the maps and border disputes with Vietnam. Foreign Minister Hor Namhong stated, ‘The maps issue must be finished at this time. … We don’t want political parties using the border issue to incite people to go against the government.’

Instead, the Cambodian government tasked a group of technical experts to compare the borders detailed on these maps with the existing border markers. The Royal Academy of Cambodia was tasked with conducting objective research on border demarcation and providing policy recommendations. The Academy is expected to finish their research within the next two years.

But border-related political tensions between the government and opposition party have not receded. A number of people have been arrested for trying to stir anti-Vietnam nationalism by accusing the government of using fake border maps. In August CNRP Senator Hong Sok Hou was arrested for posting a fake version of the bilateral treaty between Cambodia and Vietnam in 1979 on his personal Facebook page. The fake treaty in the Facebook post purported that Heng Samrin, Cambodia’s then head of state, had proposed to dissolve the border between Cambodia and Vietnam. Hong Sok Hou is now being tried in court.

The border disputes will continue as long as domestic political dynamics in Cambodia continue to evolve around assertive nationalism. More transparency and public participation are urgently needed in the border negotiations and demarcation process between Cambodia and its neighbours. In the absence of these checks, the general public will remain vulnerable to political manipulation.

Vannarith Chheang is a Chairman of the Cambodian Institute for Strategic Studies (CISS).

4 responses to “How Cambodian nationalism is driving border disputes with Vietnam”

  1. Honestly, the whole Mekong delta use to be part of Cambodian territory. Even Saigon was a Cambodian port city. The Mekong delta is considered an indigenous homeland of where the Khmer people started. So it will continue to be an issue of conflict to the future

    • Only half of modern Cambodia was ever Khmer and a lot of Thailand was, too. So don’t get them confused. More to the point, the vaunted CISS rhetoric oh so closely resembles the ruling party’s propaganda. Why is it presented as an independent analysis? My bulgarian friend got shot off his motorcycle the night Hun Sen brought tanks into the city and stationed hit men behind bushes. Since then one keeps one’s opinions to oneself. Much like Stalin. Speaking as an independent analyst, that is.

    • @James: Saigon has been part of Vietnam since 1690s, long before California and Texas being part of the US. You will hardly find a Khmer in Saigon now. The bitterness is understandable but raising it to a conflict is incomprehensible.

  2. Clearly, the real concern of opposition party and people have not been stated. When one person and on political party making decision over this 60 years old -historical-land dispute maps with Vietnam, it is not political parties using the border issue to incite people to go against the government and to create political tensions to the government or as a mean anti-Vietnamese political rhetoric. This is very dangerous to nation of having such obedience government, reporters, and supporters to make decision that is benefit to foreign country. what if leaders like Ho Nam Hun, Hun Sen, or other a fews are misled or conditioned not to serve its own nation, will you still can call this Khmer nationalism and opposition actions are anti-vietnamese. We just want our leaders to bit more transparacy and to put its own citizens and nation first. To do so is to allow people to voice their concerns and to have other political parties to fully get involve from begin to end.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.