Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

China’s outdated war on drugs

Reading Time: 4 mins
A policeman looks on as confiscated drugs are burned during a campaign ahead of the International Day against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, in Lanzhou, Gansu province, China, 22 June 2017 (Photo: Reuters/Stringer).

In Brief

Every year, tens of thousands of people worldwide die from opioid-related overdoses, many of which are linked to the powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl. Journalists and politicians have called on China, the primary source of fentanyl, to do more to stamp out production and interdict shipments of the drug. These calls ignore China's own domestic war on drugs, one rooted in the memory of the country's humiliation at the hands of imperial Britain in the 1839–42 Opium War.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Following the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) seizure of power in 1949, the Party moved to eradicate domestic drug use and production through a mixture of compulsory detention and brutal repression. Closed borders and tight political control ensured drug use remained low until the 1980s. But the post-Mao economic reforms that opened China’s markets to the world also reconnected China to the drug economies of Southeast Asia. Drug use — first opioids like heroin and later amphetamine-type stimulants — quickly spread from China’s southern borders and ports to the rest of the country.

In response, China launched a now three decade-long ‘people’s war on drugs’. Detention has been the primary weapon: drug use can carry a two-year sentence in a compulsory drug detention centre. Since drug use is a non-criminal offence, police can pass sentences without going through the judicial system. Forced labour and detainee abuse has been widely documented at these centres. Most are former re-education-through-labour camps run by the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice. Individuals released from detention are registered with the government and placed under police supervision for a further three years, during which they are subjected to scheduled and random urological tests. Testing positive for drug use can mean a return to detention.

Unsurprisingly, detention has failed to reduce demand. Relapse rates among former detainees run as high as 90 per cent while the number of registered individuals has ballooned from 250,000 in 1992 to 2.5 million in 2016. Estimates of unregistered individuals are unreliable but could run higher than 14 million.

Nor are the costs of this war born equally across society. As in the West, China’s war on drugs is a war on the poor. High-profile arrests — like that of Jackie Chan’s son Jaycee Chan for drug offences in 2014 — obscure the fact that from 1998 to 2016 the proportion of drug users listed as underemployed or unemployed rose from 45.2 per cent to 61.6 per cent.

The Chinese government is beginning to recognise that punitive detention alone will not eliminate drug use and has slowly embraced health-focussed harm reduction strategies over the last fourteen years, including methadone maintenance therapy and needle exchanges for people who use heroin. These Health Ministry-funded programs — often run by people with experience using drugs — have helped individuals safely manage their use. HIV positivity among people who use heroin also fell from 9.3 per cent in 2009 to 4.2 per cent in 2016.

China’s embrace of harm reduction might seem enlightened compared with Russia, the Philippines and the United States, where harm reduction interventions are illegal or underfunded. But these interventions are limited by two factors.

First, North American harm reduction interventions aim to reduce both opioid-related overdoses and the spread of HIV/AIDS among users of injectable drugs. But Chinese harm reduction programs focus overwhelmingly on tackling HIV/AIDS alone. China’s first major outbreak of the disease occurred among injecting users of heroin along the Sino–Myanmar border in 1989. Until the early 2000s, drug injection was the primary driver of HIV/AIDS. Methadone and needle exchange programs were the government’s successful response to this health crisis.

Over the last decade, drug use patterns in China have changed. In 2005, 78 per cent of all registered drug users took heroin. By 2016, 60 per cent were using non-opioid amphetamine-type stimulants. Despite these changes, harm reduction remains heroin-focussed. Opioid substitution treatments are clearly inappropriate for people who use non-opioids. For health officials concerned with the spread of HIV/AIDS, there is little incentive to fund drug harm reduction programs aimed at people who do not inject heroin and who are unlikely to contract the disease through the sharing of needles.

Second, the Chinese government would gain little domestically by adopting a less punitive approach. There is little public appetite for drug decriminalisation, nor sympathy for people who use. Meanwhile, cracking down on drug-related offences provides President Xi Jinping’s government with an easy way to demonstrate its tough stance on crime. Powerful bureaucratic interests further entrench failed policies. Compulsory detention may not ‘cure’ detainees but the system does provide funds and employment for members of judicial and public security organs. And from the perspective of the Ministry of Public Security, post-detention programs structured around compulsory urological tests and HIV/AIDS screenings of registered individuals can be useful tools of social control.

China’s war on drugs is unlikely to end anytime soon. China is now a drug-war evangelist who chastises those at home and abroad who critique the failed policies of the past. One can only hope that China responds to these criticisms before it confronts its own overdose epidemic.

Emile Dirks is a PhD Candidate at the Department of Political Science, University of Toronto.

2 responses to “China’s outdated war on drugs”

  1. Well the USA has fought a drug war for 40 plus years and it has not achieved any victory at all. All it has done is criminalized the poor people and minorities (President Nixon admitted he created the war on drugs to smash Afro-American civil right groups and keep the blacks under control), created more corruption and brutality in the police departments, having politicians, district attorneys, and judges trying to outdo each other in who is the toughest person on crime, while shoving all the economic, social, political, and racial problems under the rug.

    The Chinese government made a mistake about opening up its economy and country to the forces of “free market” and “capitalism” without considering how organized crime (particularly the Triads) would take advantage of the loosing of the borders and government regulation of the economy.

    BTW, the Taiwanese government under the Kuomintang Party rule did not tolerate drug production and drug dealing on Taiwan while at the same time, got involved in the Golden Triangle drug operations to send drugs all over the world. From what I heard, since the loosing of the relationships between Chian and Taiwan, you have increase smuggling between the countries and Taiwan has a drug problem in their own country. Taiwan had gang problems and they only reason why they had them was that many of those gang members were sons of fathers who themselves Triad members when they fled China and the sons use their fathers power and influence to protect themselves from the police.

    • While I’m not familiar with the history of the Triads in China & Taiwan, I agree with you about the importance of the international dimension of China’s war on drugs. It’s impossible to separate China’s war from it’s historical/regional roots, including the fallout from the Chinese civil war and the ongoing civil war in Northern Myanmar. There is some great work done on the interplay of civil conflict, capitalism and the drug trade done by Burma scholars like Kevin Woods work on “ceasefire capitalism” and Bertil Lintner’s writings on the war in Shan and Kachin States. David Steinberg and Fan Hongwei’s work on the effect of deepening post-Mao economic ties between Yunnan and Myanmar on broader Sino-Myanmar relations is also worth reading.

      As for the US’ own war on drugs: absolutely. It has been and continues to be a war against the poor and people of colour. Actually, I’d be hard pressed to think of a single national case in the developed or developing world where the prosecution of this war has not been measured overwhelmingly in the lives of societies most vulnerable.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.