Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

Japan’s factions face off before leadership ballot

Reading Time: 5 mins
Protesters hold placards during a rally denouncing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, his wife Akie, and Finance Minister Taro Aso over a suspected cover-up of a cronyism scandal in Tokyo, Japan, 25 March 2018 (Photo: Reuters/Issei Kato).

In Brief

If Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is to remain in power for the foreseeable future, he must ensure that a majority of his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)’s factions validate his leadership during the party’s triennial presidential election this September. This task may be unhinged by persistent doubts surrounding Abe’s involvement in two scandals over suspected cronyism and separate allegations of bureaucratic negligence and sexual misconduct at his defence and finance ministries respectively.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

But Abe’s plummeting approval ratings have stabilised and his administration will likely persevere due to the absence of a strong successor.

Abe’s renewed political capital since his party’s landslide victory in the Diet House of Representatives ‘snap election’ in October 2017 has failed to alleviate public mistrust of Abe and members of his inner circle. To date, this mistrust has centred around Finance Minister Taro Aso, with opposition lawmakers implicating Aso in the discounted sale of public land to Moritomo Gakuen, an ultraconservative school operator closely affiliated with Abe. Aso has already weathered multiple calls for his resignation that came despite his key position in the coalition of factions supporting Abe.

With several prime-ministerial hopefuls waiting in the wings, party lawmakers who are uneasy about their representation ahead of the 2019 Diet House of Councillors election will fight in September and beyond to elevate new leaders who can more effectively address economic revitalisation, strengthen Japan’s alliances with the United States and in Asia and neutralise external threats from North Korea and China. Even if Abe should secure another term as LDP President — a plausible outcome if no further evidence emerges around the scandals — his and Aso’s political vulnerability may allow the various factions to exact greater concessions and control over government decision-making and to shape policy beyond the summer months.

By September, some factions may tire of Abe’s stilted progress on economic revitalisation and constitutional reform and his inability to inspire public confidence, much less maintain order in the Diet. Opposition lawmakers have obstructed the current ordinary Diet session multiple times, which forced the LDP and junior coalition partner Komeito to extend the session by a month to ratify key legislation related to casino-based integrated resorts and white-collar labour reforms.

Further underscoring Abe’s vulnerability are the glimmers of antipathy and ambition displayed by LDP General Council Chair Wataru Takeshita — the new leader of the party’s third-largest faction. With his faction’s rank-and-file growing frustrated by its poor cabinet representation and failure to deploy a candidate in recent presidential elections, Takeshita may attempt to assume the role of powerbroker in September or even field a successor candidate from his political base. But Takeshita is not expected to seek higher office himself and the faction’s other distinguished names (Economic Revitalisation Minister Toshimitsu Motegi and Health Minister Katsunobu Kato) are seen as lacking the ‘centripetal force’ needed to carry the party. Takeshita may throw his faction’s weight behind either of Abe’s other strongest rivals — former LDP secretary-general Shigeru Ishiba or current LDP Policy Research Council Chair Fumio Kishida.

Ishiba has spent years positioning unsuccessfully against the current administration and today remains a public favourite alongside former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi’s son Shinjiro, who is also a prime-ministerial hopeful. The elder Koizumi has been publicly dismissive of Abe in recent months and may help his son onto higher office. Ishiba’s established reputation as an Abe critic, coupled with his experience and the younger Koizumi’s lack thereof, makes him the better candidate in this election cycle. Yet like Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Seiko Noda — another Abe rival who is dismissive of Abe’s economic policies — Ishiba has been marginalised within the party since establishing his own faction in 2015.

For his part, Kishida is taciturn about his political future. Having secured two additional cabinet seats for his faction during the previous cabinet reshuffle in August 2017, Kishida may be reluctant to challenge Abe. Indeed, Kishida declined an offer from Aso to unite their factions in 2017. While Aso may fancy himself a kingmaker, Abe’s elevation of Aso’s close associate Taro Kono to foreign minister may defray any bad faith between Abe and Aso following the Moritomo scandal. This all bodes ill for Ishiba, whose prospects of displacing Abe are slim without the support of either Kishida or Aso.

While the LDP does not espouse a unified party platform, most party members cleave to several broad principles regardless of factional allegiance. With the party’s collective support for export-based economic growth and close cooperation with the United States on security issues, new scandal-free leaders could shift the aperture of Japan’s economic recovery and international partnerships. They could double down on Abe’s prior commitments to economic revitalisation and a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’, or explore an additional rebalancing towards China, the latter given doubts regarding the future of US policies that affect Japan.

Despite Abe’s ostensibly easy rapport with US President Donald Trump, their governments have been at loggerheads over US protectionism and North Korea. Tokyo must rebuild that level of trust from the ground up regardless of whichever prime minister navigates this critical juncture in the bilateral relationship. Though Tokyo’s posture towards the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership can be expected to remain forward-leaning and contrary to Trump’s, new leadership could revisit a formalised bilateral trade agreement with the United States. The new ‘free, fair and reciprocal’ trade mechanism led by Motegi and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer will likely attempt to mitigate long-term tensions while avoiding major adjustments to the framework of bilateral economic relations.

Elliot I Silverberg is an International Relations Master’s Degree candidate at the Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University.

2 responses to “Japan’s factions face off before leadership ballot”

  1. “Japan’s factions face off….”

    Why the misleading headline? LDP factions are not “Japan’s factions.”

    This pattern of making anything done by any identifiable entity in Japan as “Japan’s …” strikes me as somewhat racist. I don’t see it for other countries.

    A small town in Japan does something. It gets headlined in English as “Japan [does this, that, and the other thing.]”

    A particular Japanese company does something. It gets headlined in English as “Japan [does this, that, and the other thing.]”

    We Japanese do not all look the same. Japan is not composed of one hundred million hearts beating as one. Japanese have distinct identities, thought, and behaviour. Japanese companies have distinct identities, policies, and behaviour. Japanese political parties have distinct identities, policies, and behaviour.

    Unless the subject is national government policy, a headline of the form “Japan’s XYZ [does this, that, and the other thing]” is not just ridiculous, it is offensive.

    Factions in the LDP are no more “Japan’s factions” than factions within the Republican Party are “America’s factions.”

  2. For those of us who do not read Japanese this summary of the factional aspects of the dynamics operating within the LDP was very informative.

    The degree to which nepotism is relevant to Japanese politics is not noted here. Eg, Abe’s grandfather was a PM. Former PM Koizumi’s son is an aspiring member of the LDP. There are probably others as well whom I am not aware of.

    I must note that Abe’s ‘ostensibly easy rapport’ with Trump is an illusion. As Macron in France and Trudeau in Canada have found this can vanish in as much time as it takes Trump to send out a tweet. While Abe or any other leader should attempt to negotiate ‘a better deal’ over trade than the upcoming tariffs imply, anyone dealing with Trump should realize just how elusive any kind of ongoing reciprocity based on rapport/trust is with him.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.