Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

PNG: FTAs helping or hindering trade?

Reading Time: 3 mins

In Brief

What of PNG trade policy and the various trade agreements that have been signed and those proposed?

The first thing that I would say is to reiterate Prof. Jagdish Bhagwati’s comments on the question of whether preferential regional trade agreements are ‘stepping stones or stumbling blocks’ for trade growth when he delivered the 2006 Heinz Arndt memorial public lecture at the ANU.

Bhagwati called the proliferation of preferential regional trade agreements a ‘pox’ on the world trading system, noting that they result in trade diversion rather than trade creation. This is especially the case with preferential trade agreements among small, developing countries. I would add that they divert tariff revenue and investment from the smaller, less well-developed countries in such trading blocs to the more developed. As regards the Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) preferential agreement amongst the Pacific island countries, I anticipate that any benefits will mainly accrue to Fiji and PNG and the disadvantage that they will suffer will only make the other Pacific islands countries even more antagonistic towards freer trade (see my ADB study, Pacific Trade Issues, [pdf])

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Bhagwati also pointed to the fact that most countries, but most of all poor countries, have only a limited supply of the skills needed to understand, negotiate, and implement trade agreements. Therefore, the proliferation of so-called regional trade agreements means that scarce skilled resources are distracted from the primary task of ensuring that best use is made of membership of the WTO.

PNG is a member of the WTO; but it is also a member of the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG), the Australia-PNG Trade Agreement, and APEC, among others, and has recently been negotiating the Economic Partnership Agreement with the EU and signed an Interim Partnership Agreement with the EU because of the failure to conclude those negotiations. And the negotiations over Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) with Australia and New Zealand are forthcoming. PNG and Fiji, let alone the smaller Pacific island countries, have few people with high-level trade theory and policy skills and little in the way of trade negotiating skills.

It is good to see that Australia is assisting the Pacific island countries to improve their understanding of trade policy and to improve their trade negotiating skills in preparation for the upcoming negotiations of PACER. I was also pleased to see the emphasis that Trade Minister Simon Crean (in the biennial Sir Arthur Tange Lecture In Australian Diplomacy) gave to trade facilitation as part of the agreement to come from the PACER negotiations. As small and isolated countries, the Pacific island countries need to reduce their costs of trading on international markets as much as possible.

Papua New Guineans worry about being ‘flooded’ with imports as the result of lowering trade barriers and being inundated with workers as the result of any Mode IV agreement. But there has not been a ‘flood’ of imports as a result of the Trade Reform Program already undertaken. As far as expatriate workers are concerned, skilled workers should be welcomed as they are complementary to the employment of local labour. With respect to the employment of unskilled overseas workers, the pressure to raise the minimum wage back to the previous level should be resisted; as such wage increases would not be based on productivity increases—as there has hardly been any—and would only lead to further interest in bringing in unskilled overseas labour.

So my recommendations on trade policy are the following. Keep opening up the economy, particularly in services—such as has been done to some extent in transport and telecommunications services. Give much less attention to preferential trade agreements with other less-developed countries, such as PICTA and the MSG, and focus more on deep integration with larger, developed countries—starting with PACER. And keep working on the other remaining internal constraints.

Comments are closed.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.