Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

China’s export restrictions on rare earths

Reading Time: 4 mins

In Brief

China is the world’s largest depositor, producer, consumer and exporter of rare earths, controlling 97 per cent of the global supplies.

But with China’s export restrictions, the gap between demand and supply is growing because of the dearth of any other major supplying nation.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

In recent years, the Chinese government has cut down the number of export enterprises, export quotas and the annual exploitation volume of rare earth ores. Users of the minerals in industrialised countries now face tighter supplies and higher prices. China has cut its export quotas for rare earths by 35 per cent in the first round of permits for 2011, threatening to extend a global shortage of the minerals needed for smart phones, hybrid cars and guided missiles.

With the current quota system, China does not distinguish between the individual rare earth oxides but limits the total tonnage of exports across the board. This has led to Chinese companies exporting as much of the high-value heavy rare earths like dysprosium as possible, instead of low-value light ones, like cerium.

China’s imposition of export quotas on several rare earth metals, on the grounds that it needs the higher quantities for its clean energy and high-tech sectors, is squeezing an already starved market. China wants rare earth companies to increase profits by using the minerals to make more technologically-advanced products, rather than exporting the raw material. While it has cut foreign sale quotas of the raw materials, there are no restrictions on exports of finished products.

Analysts predict that by 2014 the rest of the world could face a major supply crisis because of China’s reduced or zero supply. The gap in demand and supply is expected to reach 30,000–40,000 tonnes by 2012 in the absence of any new large supplier. China’s growing economy is creating a worldwide risk to supply, as its growing consumption limits its exports of rare earths.

Recently, China announced that it would further tighten its rare earths exports even after the WTO’s ruling in July 2011 that China violated international trade rules by restricting the exportation of raw materials, refuting Beijing’s claim that these restrictions were based on environmental grounds. China rejected the WTO ruling arguing that it was unfair and subjective, exposing the insufficient representation of developing countries in the WTO and its inability to understand developing nations’ problems.

Export restrictions are designed to meet diverse policy objectives that range from environmental protection and increasing fiscal revenue to the development of processing sectors. But China believes its export restriction policy was justified under the WTO’s General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) general exception clause Article XX, for the purpose of natural resource conservation and the protection of public health.

China’s defence hinged on two other important provisions of the GATT: one supports use of trade restrictions when exhaustible natural resources are involved, and the other allows temporary use of export prohibitions or restrictions to prevent or relieve critical shortages of products essential to the exporting countries.

China has officially cited environmental issues as one of the key factors for its recent regulation of the industry, but non-environmental motives are also driving China’s rare earth policy. According to The Economist, ‘[s]lashing their exports of rare-earth metals … is all about moving Chinese manufacturers up the supply chain, so they can sell valuable finished goods to the world rather than lowly raw materials’.

Businesses and policy makers are concerned about the increasingly restrictive and unpredictable nature of international trade in industrial raw materials. Multilateral disciplines governing the use of export restrictions are weak. This creates uncertainty for industries that depend on supply of these materials and raises the risk for investment in both mining and processing facilities worldwide.

There is no evidence China’s export restrictions had the desired effect on production. In order to fulfil the stated policy objectives of environmental stability and preservation of natural resources, the export restrictions would have needed to decrease the production of rare earth elements in China. This has not been the case, as production has risen continually over the years and so the measures that were introduced are yet to achieve their stated objectives.

Nabeel A Mancheri is a Postdoctoral Associate at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore.

2 responses to “China’s export restrictions on rare earths”

  1. While there are complaints of China’s export restrictions on rare earth minerals, most do not show the impact on prices of those minerals. It would be useful to include price information in such discussions.
    I am not familiar with the situation of rare earth mineral deposits, production and supplies in both China and in the world. I think if China produces 97% of world supplies, a fair rule for China to play should be index the prices of rare earth minerals with other international minerals and metal prices and imposes some sort of royalties based on such indexation.
    Australia is an introducing mineral resources rent tax on some minerals, following the failure of an earlier attempt by the Rudd government to introduce a mining super profit tax.
    Arguably, there are some differences between China and Australia in terms of the ownership of minerals (more broadly the land). Private ownership of land is not as significant in China as in Australia. The Chinese government arguably has stronger legal authority to impose a mineral rent tax based on the ownership status.
    Once the mineral rent issue is resolved, China should not impose export quotas, so both Chinese and non-Chinese customers of rare earth will face the same price.
    Of course, China can take additional measures based on environmental concerns, but that should be done on the non-discriminatory basis, that is, not targeting trade.

    • The situation today with the rare earth metals has
      put manufacturers of electronics and equipment for green energy,
      in a difficult situation depending on the political leadership of China. Major corporations are
      forced to seek alternative suppliers. We are considering all the options including from
      the recovery of previously closed mines due to non-profitability of plants
      to the develop of new fields.
      For example, there are such plans in Canada and the USA.
      Often the content of rare earth metals in the ore of new deposits is
      lower than it is in the industrial waste of metallurgical plants accumulated
      in the first half and middle of 20 century in the mills of the former
      Soviet Union. An imperfect technology existed in the enterprises that
      were not allowed to extract rare earth metals from ore, and most of them
      remained in the waste. In fact, today these wastes are ‘concentrated’
      rare earth metal. The volume of this waste is tens of millions of tons.
      It is also important that:
      • Wastes are readily available, they do not need to be extracted nor transport.
      • Plants that would not pay huge fines for environmental damage and
      not to fund work on recycling the waste transferred to the ownership
      of municipalities. In the municipalities there are no funds for
      disposal of these wastes and they are ready to cooperate with the
      proposers of decommissioning projects. This allows cheap raw
      materials for a long time.
      Our company’s specialists have developed technology that allows
      processing of industrial waste and get rare metals.
      We are interested in investors.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.