Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

China’s two-child policy one year on

Reading Time: 4 mins
A couple and their baby on the Tiananmen Gate, Beijing, 2 November, 2015 (Photo: Reuters/Kim Kyung-Hoon).

In Brief

At the beginning of 2016 the Chinese government relaxed its family planning laws to allow all married couples to have a second child. The new policy came into effect in March after formal ratification by the National People’s Congress. But, one year on, how effective has this new policy really been?

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

During the 12th National People’s Congress in March 2017, Wang Pei’an, Deputy Director of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, reported that live births in national hospitals numbered 18.46 million in 2016 and that the fertility rate reached 1.7 per cent — the highest rate since 2000.

This initial progress is owing to hard work by both the Chinese government and society over the past year.

To encourage couples to have a second child, the 18th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress reviewed the ‘Amendment to the Population and Family Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China’. Their new draft argues for implementing a comprehensive two-child policy and advocates for couples to have two children. Here the government deliberately used the term ‘advocate’ instead of ‘allow’.

Encouraging fertility has become common in many sectors of Chinese society. For instance, many television stations are making efforts to create a climate of respect for families and fertility, as illustrated by television programs on CCTV’s annual Spring Festival Gala.

But the new two-child policy has not been an easy fix for China’s population problems. According to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics, China’s total population reached 1.383 billion in 2016. The annual population increase for the year was 17.86 million, 1.31 million more than in 2015. But in some provinces the fertility rate is still lower than the previous year. If the total population is to reach 1.42 billion by 2020, China must achieve an average annual population increase of at least 19 million. The population growth rate is still far from satisfactory.

According to the National Health and Family Planning Commission, since the beginning of 2016 more than half of the 90 million newly eligible couples included women aged 35 years and older. Geng Linlin, deputy director of the clinical centre at the commission’s scientific research institute, notes that many of these women find it difficult to have a second baby.

What’s more, according to research undertaken by population scholar Liang Jianzhang, 70–80 per cent of Chinese couples want to have two children, but only 3 per cent would dare to do so. Over the next decade, the number of women of peak childbearing age will fall by about 40 per cent. As a result, it is highly likely that the birth rate will fall sharply after 2018.

Even with policy changes, other social factors are continuing to suppress fertility rates. In a survey conducted by the National Health and Family Planning Commission in 2015, respondents cited financial pressures, the work involved in raising children and a shortage of caretakers as primary reasons for not having a second child.

Social factors that limit fertility rates are diverse, from female employment discrimination in maternal and childcare related work to environmental pollution, widespread chemicals usage and exposure to electromagnetic radiation. All of these factors influence people’s ability and desire to reproduce. As a result, an increasing number of Chinese are looking overseas to realise their dream of having a second child.

Researchers and experts have advocated for the government to take further measures. Liang Jianzhang, for example, has argued that ‘since there is an ambitious plan, there must be appropriate measures to be taken to fulfil it’.

Although a comprehensive two-child policy can temporarily alleviate overall population reduction and a shrinking labour force, the more difficult problem is how to slow down China’s ageing and deteriorating population structure in the long term. To this end, family planning policies should be completely abolished.

In November 2016, an important report edited by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences was published. It points out that lifestyle changes can lead to delays in marriage and childbearing . In order to avoid falling into the ‘low fertility trap’ — where people’s fertility and fertility behaviour continue to decline despite seemingly appropriate policy measures — China may need to further relax or even abolish birth restrictions. On 5 March 2017, Premier Li Keqiang noted in his Government Work Report that ‘To adapt to the implementation of a comprehensive two child policy, reproductive health care services should be strengthened’. This seems to be a step in the right direction.

But in order to encourage couples to have a second child, the government should look to take further measures that support and subsidise the costs associated with family life — particularly in the areas of education, medical care and employment. This will reduce the concerns facing those raising children and help to readjust some of the social and financial burdens that unsettle young couples in China today.

Liu Lili is Professor at the Department of Culture and History, Chinese Central Party School, Beijing.

4 responses to “China’s two-child policy one year on”

  1. The case for pro-natalist policies advocated in this piece seems inconsistent with the broad goal of raising the standard of living for the Chinese population as a whole. What is missing is a discussion of China’s optimum population size. China’s anti-natalist policies of the past 30 years have undergirded China’s rise to middle income status. It seems delusional to think that boosting China’s population above 1.5 billion in the medium term will improve lives in general. More likely it will mostly compound the current problem of overeducated and underemployed youth. Wouldn’t life for all be better in 2030 for example with a total population of 1.1 or 1.2 billion?

    • The reason China needs an increase in population it is increasingly elderly-dependent. This puts more economic strain on the economically active population and with the shrinking birth rates there will be even less economically active. China has to increase its TFR to be able to support its aging population and eventually return to an equilibrium.

  2. Welcome to the challenges a country faces when it enters the realm of middle income. People delay having children and focus as much if not more on their own comfort and financial stability than on having 2-3 kids. The lack of adequate childcare and good educational opportunities also suppresses the birth rate. As life span grows the number of seniors increases. It is a daunting combination of challenging dynamics.

  3. While there might be a case for a more supportive environment and policies for two child policy, rushing into a new policy tp achieve superficial and immediate effects may actually generate serious unintended consequenes. There is no need to think of it as a political campaign and certainly no case for over-corecting the perceived problems. Give people more time and respect their choices in terms of the number of children they want to have and the timing for those children. It is unclear what is the optimal transitional course for people to have two children. And there is no need to be alarmed about the current situation. Further, it is important to avoid potential future policy reversal.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.