The lesson the Japanese leadership drew was that Japan needs to have stronger military capabilities to defend itself. Open debates concerning ‘the ability to attack enemy bases’ or ‘nuclear sharing system in NATO’ will now arise. Strengthening the Japan–US security alliance in a way that allows Japan to possess greater responsibility will certainly be sought after.
The Japanese government is currently rethinking its foreign policy priorities. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already chosen to align in full with the United States, the G7, Australia and other countries which share common values. Japan became one of the most active countries in implementing strong sanctions against Russia in support of Ukraine.
As Russian aggression towards Ukraine became more visible, Kishida’s openly negative stance towards Russia became more apparent. On 7 March, he stated that the ‘Northern Territories are inherent territories of Japan’ and on 8 March Foreign Minister Hayashi followed that they are ‘unlawfully occupied by Russia’. Japan does not intend to settle the issue through negotiations. On 9 March Kishida referred Russia to the International Criminal Court. What the two countries inherited from Gorbachev nearly 40 years ago will all be wiped out. For the foreseeable future, Japan–Russia relations will be one of the most troubled in Northeast Asia.
Kishida is paying great attention to how China is reacting to the Ukrainian crisis. The invasion of Ukraine has put China in an advantageous geopolitical situation. Biden is bound to spend more time settling the war in Europe. His demonising of Russian President Vladimir Putin compels Putin to align closer with China. China has been carefully watching how the geopolitical advantage has been turning into China’s favour.
Chinese President Xi Jinping must be asking why Biden, ceding geopolitical advantage to China, is crushing Russia’s international standing to an unprecedented low point since the end of the Second World War. Xi, knowing Putin, cannot miss his long-term strategy. Putin’s objective when he was first president (from 2000–08) was to make Russia a powerful state worthy of respect. From 2012, during his second term in office, his goal was to restructure the European security system, at the centre of which Russia would be placed.
For the recreation of a new security structure, keeping Ukraine and Georgia as non-NATO states — serving as a buffer or a neutral territory — was a prerequisite. Putin’s strategy, most likely understood and accepted by Xi, fits in well with John Mearsheimer’s view expressed in his article ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault’ and later confirmed in a New Yorker article.
But Biden gave every sign of encouragement to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, urging him not to abide by the Minsk II agreement, to take back Crimea and join NATO under the legal framework of Article 10 of the NATO Charter. Biden must have known that encouraging Zelensky toward NATO participation goes beyond Putin’s redline, which was publicly announced at NATO’s 2008 Bucharest Summit. Xi must have foreseen that Biden’s rigidity to protect Ukraine’s right for NATO membership will push Putin to show the world that he would reject this, even by mobilising military force.
Xi must be thinking deeply about the implications of Biden receiving all the benefit in repudiating Putin’s aggression. Biden is not shedding US blood in Ukraine. Ukrainians are willing to fight uncompromisingly against Russian aggression. NATO countries are reunited due to facing a new Russian threat and are supplying arms to Ukrainians. Putin’s objective to come back to Europe as a respected great power is now completely crushed and ‘Europe at the exclusion of Russia’ is emerging. Biden’s repeated message that attacks will come from Putin now has prophetic impact that Putin was evil by nature.
In addition, Europe has finally lowered its energy dependency on Russian gas and oil, which is now to be partly supplied from the United States.
But this is not yet the end of history. From China’s perspective, China views Putin not as irrational, but dangerous. Putin’s military operation does not seem to be proceeding as successfully as he had planned. He shall not stop his military operation without achieving his objective. There is no reason to exclude the usage of nuclear weapons from his military operation.
Xi must be pondering whether Biden is able to solve mounting horror in Europe. If he cannot, what will Biden’s international standing be? How will it affect China’s future position in the world? Xi stated on 8 March 2022 that he is troubled about the war in Europe and is ready to play a positive role but would not join sanctions against Russia. Japanese policy makers are watching the conclusion Xi comes to on Biden and how his conclusion might affect future peace and stability in Northeast Asia.
Kazuhiko Togo is Visiting Professor at the Global Centre for Asian and Regional Research, University of Shizuoka. He was formerly Director General of the Treaties Bureau at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan.
Events in Ukraine have proven what I suspected all along about Japanese efforts to negotiate with Putin over the return of the Northern Territories: he never negotiates with an eye towards reciprocal compromise. Once the Russians take control over some territory they don’t give it up unless they exact a huge price in some other way. It is better for Kishida to put that fantasy to rest and to accept the fact that those islands are and will probably always be part of Russia.
The author claims that Europe has ‘finally lowered’ its dependence on Russian oil and natural gas. Although the EU has announced its intention to do this, their plan will take many years. When some of the member countries rely on Russia for 40per cent of its energy, making a change like this is not as simple as throwing a switch. It will time and effort to transition to renewable sources of energy. If anything ‘good’ comes out of this crisis in Ukraine, it will be that the EU and hopefully other parts of the world realize how imperative it is to make the transition to renewable energy ASAP. Geopolitics and climate change both dictate this.
True. However, Xi has a bigger and more immediate problem. He may be watching carefully, but he cannot watch from the sidelines: the ground under his feet is moving. After pressing his borders aggressively outward against his neighbors for a decade, he has cemented his image as a relentless aggressor. By announcing an “unlimited partnership” with Putin days before the attack on Ukraine, Xi has made himself look complicit. He and Putin, by their actions, have achieved a kind of miracle: fractious, divided, lazy and reluctant democracies have formed into a coalition of coalitions that amounts to a nuclear-armed picket surrounding the two dictators. Xi has spurred even Japan to muse about nuclear weapons, and the Quad and AUKUS to form, just as Putin has pushed Germany into previously unthinkable armament expenditures and nuclear-sharing upgrades. Xi does not need to do anything new to worsen his condition. The same aggressive actions he took regularly over the last several years, if he takes them today, will have an entirely new effect on the now-alerted democracies. Xi is just one wrong step away from joining Putin on the wrong side of a wall of sanctions that will decisively rob him of his China Dream and set back China decades. Ironically, Xi spoke not long ago of an immovable iron wall of determination, on which any opponent would break his head. If he is lucky, he will realize that he has created this wall, before he breaks himself on it.