Peer reviewed analysis from world leading experts

Vietnam fights for foreign investors

Reading Time: 5 mins
A woman rides a bicycle past the stock exchange centre in Hanoi, Vietnam, 1 September 2015 (Photo: Reuters/Nguyen Thanh Cao)

In Brief

Foreign direct investment in Vietnam continues to increase, rising from US$11.57 billion in July to US$12.8 billion in August 2022, signalling the country’s recovery from COVID-19. The growth is partly due to Hanoi’s consistent efforts to provide a safe and welcoming environment for foreign business through Special Economic Zones (SEZs) — ensuring companies have access to a local workforce in favourable conditions.

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

Share

  • A
  • A
  • A

There is a new impetus to invest in Vietnam due to the disruption in supply chains from China’s zero-COVID-19 policy, the threat of Chinese aggression towards Taiwan and Beijing’s strengthening ties with Russia. Taiwan’s electronic manufacturing giant Foxconn plans to increase its in-country presence, with first-ever plans to manufacture Apple Watches and MacBooks in Vietnam. Yet South Korea remains the country’s largest investor and Samsung Electronics remains its most important corporate partner.

Companies are expected to show interest in Vietnam now that the government is preparing ‘eagles’ nests’ — SEZs in which doing business is easier for foreign firms. That will help address Vietnam’s over-reliance on China for imports and the United States for exports. Diversification will improve Vietnam’s significant trade imbalance with Washington after it posted a US$69.7 billion trade surplus in goods with the United States in 2020 — a figure that exceeds that of its neighbours.

Firms arriving in Vietnam can expect to find diligent, low-cost labour and an increasingly high standard of living for their international managers, especially in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam still faces challenges in finding skilled workers in a country where parents want their children to attend university rather than vocational school. There is also a lack of good-quality small and medium-sized enterprises to join Vietnam’s supply chains, infrastructure outside the major cities is often of poor quality and air pollution kills thousands every year.

Despite these challenges, the Vietnamese government has committed itself to numerous eye-catching pledges concerning digitalisation, technology and innovation and achieving net zero emissions. But it is unclear whether these promises can be kept in the desired timeframe.

Vietnam’s connectivity with other countries stems from its willingness to become a more active global citizen. Despite starting the connectivity process later than its ASEAN neighbours, Vietnam is catching up with its neighbours in the number of free trade agreements it has signed. Hanoi has joined about every bilateral, multilateral and transnational organisation and agreement for which it is eligible.

Vietnam’s willingness to boost connectivity is also about national security. Engagement with other nations enables Vietnam to conduct complex negotiations over issues for which international law is not yet sufficient — such as riverine management and rights to deep sea resources and territory. The extensive Vietnamese diaspora offers another form of global connectivity, although there are often complicated political differences between those living inside and outside the country.

Despite Vietnam’s success in attracting investment, it will always have a finite ability to absorb infrastructure and commercial projects. Vietnam faces competition from other countries trying to attract foreign investment of their own. Countries like the Philippines, Indonesia and Bangladesh also have large labour forces — offering them competitiveness through low labour costs.

Vietnam’s SEZ-style approach succeeded in raising hundreds of millions of people out of poverty in China. It involves designating specific areas of land in which there are different legal conditions than the home country — generally those that benefit foreign capital over local labour. These zones have better infrastructure, provision of utilities and telecommunications and include custom-built retail, leisure and health facilities for company managers. SEZs allow foreign direct investment projects to be clustered together, which enables firms to reduce transaction costs by working together and sharing complementary resources and capabilities. SEZ-related incentives encourage firms to obtain specific rather than general advantages.

The Vietnamese government is also quite consistent in enforcing the rule of law. Investors know what to expect given the current political system looks set to continue for the foreseeable future. But the government needs to take immediate action to ensure high-quality public services to business and citizens. Many government employees’ lack of technical capacity remains problematic and the government’s ambitious cyber and digitalization strategies is yet to fully materialise.

The government has taken some steps towards improving the quality of labour skills and qualifications, particularly in STEM disciplines. Overseas universities are encouraged to open courses to enhance local management, creativity and innovation. Skill development will make it easier for locals to obtain work with foreign firms, encouraging some to launch their own business ventures to participate in regional and global value chains. Fostering the growth of such firms is important because, despite reforms to corporate governance, Vietnamese companies rarely provide meaningful competition for foreign firms.

The measures implemented by the Vietnamese government have achieved success over recent decades, although climate change raises concerns about the economic sustainability of its development model. Hanoi is committed to using the fruits of inward investment to enhance social development and equality, but the speed at which this is taking place remains problematic.

A new model of public administration is required to attract and retain talented people in the public service to help Vietnam navigate the complex political and economic challenges of the future.

John Walsh is Associate Dean and Director, English Language Programs at the International College, Krirk University, Thailand.

Trung Quang Nguyen is Head of the Department of Management at RMIT University Vietnam.

Burkhard Schrage is Senior Program Manager in the Management Discipline at RMIT University Vietnam.

Comments are closed.

Support Quality Analysis

Donate
The East Asia Forum office is based in Australia and EAF acknowledges the First Peoples of this land — in Canberra the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people — and recognises their continuous connection to culture, community and Country.

Article printed from East Asia Forum (https://www.eastasiaforum.org)

Copyright ©2024 East Asia Forum. All rights reserved.